Nuclear power is arguably one of humankind’s greatest achievements. However, it is also undoubtedly one of our most dangerous and terrifying. When implemented correctly, nuclear power can provide an efficient and relatively clean source of energy. However, if something goes wrong, the situation could quickly deteriorate into a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl, or, more recently, Fukushima. It has often been speculated that technology is a double-edged sword, bringing both benefits and drawbacks, and no technology fits this description better than nuclear reactors. According to Adam Piore in his article ‘Planning for the Black Swan,’ the major issue revolving around nuclear technology is that of safety versus cost. Although nuclear power can indeed provide a more efficient source of energy, with less pollution than a conventional fuel like coal, it also carries with it greater risks than these more conventional power sources. Therefore, the main problem that nuclear engineers must overcome is designing a reactor that strikes the right balance between efficiency and safety. But can nuclear technology overcome these fundamental problems? Or are conventional sources of energy a better option?
This is a great introduction, as it catches the readers attention effectively as well as informing what the paper will be about.
ReplyDelete